Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3311
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAlternate Law Forum-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-27T08:52:50Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-27T08:52:50Z-
dc.date.issued2018-02-01-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14121/3311-
dc.descriptionWages of the workers were on par with the other establishments of that area. The union could not cite any specific or relevant judgements.en_US
dc.description.abstractThey argued that they are responsible for supplying workers and Avery Dennison was responsible for fixing contracts. They denied union's demands.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectContractual Employmenten_US
dc.subjectCollective Representationen_US
dc.titleStatement of Objections from Adecco India before the Deputy Labour Commissioner and Conciliation Officeren_US
dc.typeStatement of Objectionen_US
dc.description.hostArchives of Indian Labour [V.V. Giri National Labour Institute (VVGNLI) - Association of Indian Labour Historians (AILH)]en_US
dc.description.dis“All content hosted in this archive has been obtained with prior permission and approval from the institutions, organisations, and individuals who have either published/produced or held these materials as part of their collections. These materials are meant for educational, research and for non-commercial use only.”en_US
dc.page3en_US
Appears in Collections:Case 16: Avery Denison - Termination

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Statement_of_Objections_from_Adecco_India_before_the_DLC_and_Conciliation_Officer.pdf1.92 MBAdobe PDF Preview PDFDownload


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.